Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)
Unresolved Total Trihalomethanes Rule violation cited in 2024 (total trihalomethanes (tthm)).
1 TRI facilities inside the city limits and 3 public water systems serving residents. In-city TRI releases held roughly steady year over year (0%). Toxic releases concentrations are roughly unchanged from 2020.
FIPS 0451600 · population 47,053 · Pima County
Unresolved Total Trihalomethanes Rule violation cited in 2024 (total trihalomethanes (tthm)).
Unresolved Total Trihalomethanes Rule violation cited in 2024 (haloacetic acids (haa5)).
Unresolved Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts (Stage 2) violation cited in 2024 (chlorine).
Unresolved Total Trihalomethanes Rule violation cited in 2021 (total trihalomethanes (tthm)).
PM2.5 annual mean (NAAQS 9 µg/m³ (annual)) concentrations are roughly unchanged from 2010.
PM2.5 24-hour 98th percentile (NAAQS 35 µg/m³ (24-hour)) concentrations are up 28% since 2010.
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max (NAAQS 0.070 ppm (8-hour)) concentrations are roughly unchanged from 2010.
NO₂ annual mean (NAAQS 53 ppb (annual)) concentrations have fallen 43% since 2010.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
TRI air releases (5.1 fugitive + 5.2 stack) volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
TRI water releases (5.3) volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
TRI land + off-site releases volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
Greenhouse gases (GHGRP large emitters, through 2023) concentrations are up 15% since 2010.
| Facility | Top chemical | Total releases | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ventana Medical Systems | Ethylene glycolHealth riskAcutely toxic if ingested. Metabolizes to compounds that cause kidney failure. (EPA) | 10 lb | 0% |
5 unresolved violations on the SDWIS record across utilities serving this city.
Utilities serving
Population served
Health-based · 5yr
Unresolved
| Water system | PWSID | Population served | Health-based · 5yr | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oro Valley Water Countryside Municipal | AZ0410175 | 4,534 | 0 | UNRESOLVED |
| La Cholla Airpark Private | AZ0420597 | 250 | 0 | UNRESOLVED |
Showing the 2 systems with recorded health-based or unresolved violations. 1 additional system is in compliance with no recorded health-based violations in the past 5 years and is not individually tabulated.
A public water systemis the regulated entity, not the city. EPA's SDWIS definition covers anything serving 25+ people for 60+ days a year or with 15+ service connections — that includes municipal utilities (City of Stockton), water districts, mobile home parks operating their own wells, schools, and small private subdivisions. Each system is independently monitored. Some systems serve multiple cities; some cities are served by many systems.
Oro Valley, Arizona (Census place block groups): 47,053 residents. City disparity score for pm2.5 (fine particulate) sits well below the reference (1). Why we surface this →
Low-income
People of color
Under age 5
Over age 64
| Indicator | Disparity score | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 (fine particulate) | 1 | well below the reference |
| Ozone | 64 | below the reference |
| Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) | 53 | below the reference |
| Diesel particulate | 18 | well below the reference |
| Toxic releases (RSEI) | 32 | well below the reference |
| Traffic proximity | 27 | well below the reference |
| Lead-paint risk (pre-1960 housing) | 6 | well below the reference |
| Superfund site proximity | 0 | well below the reference |
| RMP-facility proximity | 0 | well below the reference |
| Hazardous-waste site proximity | 19 | well below the reference |
| Underground storage tanks | 16 | well below the reference |
| NPDES wastewater proximity | 30 | well below the reference |
| Drinking-water non-compliance | 9 | well below the reference |
Source: Census ACS 2018-2022 (5-year) + USEPA-clone EJ blockgroup stats (raw indicators + EJ disparity mirror).
Modeled adult-prevalence estimates published by CDC PLACES, paired with this city's pollution and demographic context. Comparisons are ecological, not causal — pollution and disease prevalence covary at the area level, but the data does not attribute any individual's diagnosis to local exposure. How this section works →
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
PLACES uses BRFSS-modeled small-area estimates, not individual records. Crude prevalence shown above is the local rate as published; comparators are age-adjusted vs the Arizona mean and the US mean — both population-weighted across counties — so geographies with different age structures stay apples-to-apples. Sources: CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023.
Sources.