Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max in Tuolumne County reached 0.071 ppm in 2024, 1% above the EPA NAAQS of 0.07 ppm.
1 top TRI facilities tracked here. Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max (NAAQS 0.070 ppm (8-hour)) rose modestly year over year (+6%). Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max (NAAQS 0.070 ppm (8-hour)) concentrations have fallen 21% since 2010.
FIPS 06109 · population 54,993
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max in Tuolumne County reached 0.071 ppm in 2024, 1% above the EPA NAAQS of 0.07 ppm.
Each red dot is one of the top TRI facilities. Size reflects 2024 total releases. County boundary outlined in blue.
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max (NAAQS 0.070 ppm (8-hour)) concentrations have fallen 21% since 2010.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
TRI air releases (5.1 fugitive + 5.2 stack) volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
TRI water releases (5.3) volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
TRI land + off-site releases volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
| Facility | City | Top chemical | Total releases | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spi Sonora DivSierra Pacific Industries | Sonora | Dioxin and dioxin-like compounds | 0 lb | -25% |
All block groups in Tuolumne County County, CA: 54,993 residents. County disparity score for pm2.5 (fine particulate) sits below the reference (88). Why we surface this →
Low-income
People of color
Under age 5
Over age 64
| Indicator | Disparity score | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 (fine particulate) | 88 | below the reference |
| Ozone | 85 | below the reference |
| Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) | 25 | well below the reference |
| Diesel particulate | 6 | well below the reference |
| Toxic releases (RSEI) | 2 | well below the reference |
| Traffic proximity | 20 | well below the reference |
| Lead-paint risk (pre-1960 housing) | 34 | well below the reference |
| Superfund site proximity | 0 | well below the reference |
| RMP-facility proximity | 8 | well below the reference |
| Hazardous-waste site proximity | 29 | well below the reference |
| Underground storage tanks | 0 | well below the reference |
| NPDES wastewater proximity | 12 | well below the reference |
| Drinking-water non-compliance | 6 | well below the reference |
Source: Census ACS 2018-2022 (5-year) + USEPA-clone EJ blockgroup stats (raw indicators + EJ disparity mirror).
Modeled adult-prevalence estimates published by CDC PLACES, paired with this county's pollution and demographic context. Comparisons are ecological, not causal — pollution and disease prevalence covary at the area level, but the data does not attribute any individual's diagnosis to local exposure. How this section works →
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
PLACES uses BRFSS-modeled small-area estimates, not individual records. Crude prevalence shown above is the local rate as published; comparators are age-adjusted vs the California mean and the US mean — both population-weighted across counties — so geographies with different age structures stay apples-to-apples. Sources: CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023.
Pollution trends and TRI 2024 pages for every tracked city in this county. Alphabetical.
Sources.
All sources are federal public-domain datasets under 17 USC §105. We aggregate but do not relabel; the underlying observations remain attributable to EPA.