PM2.5 annual mean
PM2.5 annual mean in Cass County reached 10.1 µg/m³ in 2010, 12% above the EPA NAAQS of 9 µg/m³.
1 top TRI facilities tracked here. PM2.5 annual mean (NAAQS 9 µg/m³ (annual)) held roughly steady year over year (—). PM2.5 annual mean (NAAQS 9 µg/m³ (annual)) volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
FIPS 31025 · population 26,749
PM2.5 annual mean in Cass County reached 10.1 µg/m³ in 2010, 12% above the EPA NAAQS of 9 µg/m³.
Each red dot is one of the top TRI facilities. Size reflects 2024 total releases. County boundary outlined in blue.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
TRI air releases (5.1 fugitive + 5.2 stack) concentrations are up 16% since 2010.
TRI water releases (5.3) volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
TRI land + off-site releases volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
Greenhouse gases (GHGRP large emitters, through 2023) concentrations are up 36% since 2010.
| Facility | City | Top chemical | Total releases | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ash Grove Cement COCrh Americas INC | Louisville | Sulfuric acid (acid aerosols including mists, vapors, gas, fog, and other airborne forms of any particle size)Health riskAcid mists are an IARC Group 1 carcinogen via inhalation (laryngeal cancer) and corrosive on contact. (IARC) | 127k lb | -6% |
All block groups in Cass County County, NE: 26,749 residents. County disparity score for pm2.5 (fine particulate) sits well below the reference (17). Why we surface this →
Low-income
People of color
Under age 5
Over age 64
| Indicator | Disparity score | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 (fine particulate) | 17 | well below the reference |
| Ozone | 19 | well below the reference |
| Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) | 18 | well below the reference |
| Diesel particulate | 17 | well below the reference |
| Toxic releases (RSEI) | 21 | well below the reference |
| Traffic proximity | 9 | well below the reference |
| Lead-paint risk (pre-1960 housing) | 35 | well below the reference |
| Superfund site proximity | 0 | well below the reference |
| RMP-facility proximity | 32 | well below the reference |
| Hazardous-waste site proximity | 4 | well below the reference |
| Underground storage tanks | 22 | well below the reference |
| NPDES wastewater proximity | 35 | well below the reference |
| Drinking-water non-compliance | 3 | well below the reference |
Source: Census ACS 2018-2022 (5-year) + USEPA-clone EJ blockgroup stats (raw indicators + EJ disparity mirror).
Modeled adult-prevalence estimates published by CDC PLACES, paired with this county's pollution and demographic context. Comparisons are ecological, not causal — pollution and disease prevalence covary at the area level, but the data does not attribute any individual's diagnosis to local exposure. How this section works →
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
PLACES uses BRFSS-modeled small-area estimates, not individual records. Crude prevalence shown above is the local rate as published; comparators are age-adjusted vs the Nebraska mean and the US mean — both population-weighted across counties — so geographies with different age structures stay apples-to-apples. Sources: CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023.
Pollution trends and TRI 2024 pages for every tracked city in this county. Alphabetical.
Sources.
All sources are federal public-domain datasets under 17 USC §105. We aggregate but do not relabel; the underlying observations remain attributable to EPA.