Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max in Dewey County reached 0.072 ppm in 2024, 3% above the EPA NAAQS of 0.07 ppm.
1 top TRI facilities tracked here. PM2.5 annual mean (NAAQS 9 µg/m³ (annual)) held roughly steady year over year (+3%). PM2.5 annual mean (NAAQS 9 µg/m³ (annual)) concentrations are up 20% since 2014.
FIPS 40043 · population 4,504
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max in Dewey County reached 0.072 ppm in 2024, 3% above the EPA NAAQS of 0.07 ppm.
Each red dot is one of the top TRI facilities. Size reflects 2024 total releases. County boundary outlined in blue.
PM2.5 annual mean (NAAQS 9 µg/m³ (annual)) concentrations are up 20% since 2014.
PM2.5 24-hour 98th percentile (NAAQS 35 µg/m³ (24-hour)) concentrations are roughly unchanged from 2014.
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max (NAAQS 0.070 ppm (8-hour)) concentrations are roughly unchanged from 2011.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
TRI air releases (5.1 fugitive + 5.2 stack) volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
TRI water releases (5.3) volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
TRI land + off-site releases volumes here are too small to anchor a multi-year trend; YoY movement is still shown above.
Greenhouse gases (GHGRP large emitters, through 2023) concentrations are up 58% since 2012.
| Facility | City | Top chemical | Total releases | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iochem CorpToyota Tsusho America INC | Vici | ChlorineHealth riskStrong respiratory irritant; high exposure causes pulmonary edema. (CDC) | 106 lb | 0% |
All block groups in Dewey County County, OK: 4,504 residents. County disparity score for pm2.5 (fine particulate) sits well below the reference (29). Why we surface this →
Low-income
People of color
Under age 5
Over age 64
| Indicator | Disparity score | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 (fine particulate) | 29 | well below the reference |
| Ozone | 94 | near the reference |
| Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) | 17 | well below the reference |
| Diesel particulate | 5 | well below the reference |
| Toxic releases (RSEI) | 17 | well below the reference |
| Traffic proximity | 5 | well below the reference |
| Lead-paint risk (pre-1960 housing) | 69 | below the reference |
| Superfund site proximity | 0 | well below the reference |
| RMP-facility proximity | 47 | well below the reference |
| Hazardous-waste site proximity | 0 | well below the reference |
| Underground storage tanks | 32 | well below the reference |
| NPDES wastewater proximity | 37 | well below the reference |
| Drinking-water non-compliance | 56 | below the reference |
Source: Census ACS 2018-2022 (5-year) + USEPA-clone EJ blockgroup stats (raw indicators + EJ disparity mirror).
Modeled adult-prevalence estimates published by CDC PLACES, paired with this county's pollution and demographic context. Comparisons are ecological, not causal — pollution and disease prevalence covary at the area level, but the data does not attribute any individual's diagnosis to local exposure. How this section works →
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
PLACES uses BRFSS-modeled small-area estimates, not individual records. Crude prevalence shown above is the local rate as published; comparators are age-adjusted vs the Oklahoma mean and the US mean — both population-weighted across counties — so geographies with different age structures stay apples-to-apples. Sources: CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023.
Pollution trends and TRI 2024 pages for every tracked city in this county. Alphabetical.
Sources.
All sources are federal public-domain datasets under 17 USC §105. We aggregate but do not relabel; the underlying observations remain attributable to EPA.