Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max in Love County reached 0.075 ppm in 2022, 7% above the EPA NAAQS of 0.07 ppm.
No active TRI facilities reported in the most recent year. PM2.5 annual mean (NAAQS 9 µg/m³ (annual)) concentrations have fallen 30% since 2013.
FIPS 40085 · population 10,158
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max in Love County reached 0.075 ppm in 2022, 7% above the EPA NAAQS of 0.07 ppm.
Each red dot is one of the top TRI facilities. Size reflects 2024 total releases. County boundary outlined in blue.
PM2.5 annual mean (NAAQS 9 µg/m³ (annual)) concentrations have fallen 30% since 2013.
PM2.5 24-hour 98th percentile (NAAQS 35 µg/m³ (24-hour)) concentrations have fallen 26% since 2013.
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max (NAAQS 0.070 ppm (8-hour)) concentrations have fallen 22% since 2010.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
| Facility | City | Top chemical | Total releases | YoY |
|---|
All block groups in Love County County, OK: 10,158 residents. County disparity score for pm2.5 (fine particulate) sits near the reference (92). Why we surface this →
Low-income
People of color
Under age 5
Over age 64
| Indicator | Disparity score | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 (fine particulate) | 92 | near the reference |
| Ozone | 107 | near the reference |
| Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) | 19 | well below the reference |
| Diesel particulate | 32 | well below the reference |
| Toxic releases (RSEI) | 56 | below the reference |
| Traffic proximity | 14 | well below the reference |
| Lead-paint risk (pre-1960 housing) | 62 | below the reference |
| Superfund site proximity | 0 | well below the reference |
| RMP-facility proximity | 10 | well below the reference |
| Hazardous-waste site proximity | 0 | well below the reference |
| Underground storage tanks | 54 | below the reference |
| NPDES wastewater proximity | 35 | well below the reference |
| Drinking-water non-compliance | 6 | well below the reference |
Source: Census ACS 2018-2022 (5-year) + USEPA-clone EJ blockgroup stats (raw indicators + EJ disparity mirror).
Modeled adult-prevalence estimates published by CDC PLACES, paired with this county's pollution and demographic context. Comparisons are ecological, not causal — pollution and disease prevalence covary at the area level, but the data does not attribute any individual's diagnosis to local exposure. How this section works →
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
PLACES uses BRFSS-modeled small-area estimates, not individual records. Crude prevalence shown above is the local rate as published; comparators are age-adjusted vs the Oklahoma mean and the US mean — both population-weighted across counties — so geographies with different age structures stay apples-to-apples. Sources: CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023.
Pollution trends and TRI 2024 pages for every tracked city in this county. Alphabetical.
Sources.
All sources are federal public-domain datasets under 17 USC §105. We aggregate but do not relabel; the underlying observations remain attributable to EPA.