Total TRI releases
Total TRI releases at Smith County have risen 67% since 2010 (through 2024).
10 top TRI facilities tracked here. Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max (NAAQS 0.070 ppm (8-hour)) fell modestly year over year (-6%). Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max (NAAQS 0.070 ppm (8-hour)) concentrations have fallen 14% since 2010.
FIPS 48423 · population 234,667
Total TRI releases at Smith County have risen 67% since 2010 (through 2024).
Each red dot is one of the top TRI facilities. Size reflects 2024 total releases. County boundary outlined in blue.
Ozone 8-hour 4th-highest daily max (NAAQS 0.070 ppm (8-hour)) concentrations have fallen 14% since 2010.
NO₂ annual mean (NAAQS 53 ppb (annual)) concentrations have more than halved since 2010.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
Single-vintage exposure modeling — EPA cadence is multi-year, so no trend line yet.
TRI air releases (5.1 fugitive + 5.2 stack) concentrations are roughly unchanged from 2010.
TRI water releases (5.3) concentrations have more than doubled since 2019.
TRI land + off-site releases concentrations have fallen 11% since 2010.
Greenhouse gases (GHGRP large emitters, through 2023) concentrations are up 35% since 2010.
| Facility | City | Top chemical | Total releases | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanderson Farms Tyler ProcessingSanderson Farms LLC | Tyler | Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution)Health riskDrinking-water nitrate causes methemoglobinemia ('blue-baby syndrome') in infants; EPA MCL is 10 mg/L as N. (EPA) | 240k lb | -23% |
| Tyler Pipe COMcwane INC | Tyler | Zinc compoundsHealth riskGenerally low acute toxicity. Chronic high-dose exposure disrupts copper absorption and immune function. (ATSDR) | 130k lb | +48% |
| Delek Tyler RefineryDelek US Holdings INC | Tyler | PropyleneHealth riskSimple asphyxiant; low direct toxicity at typical exposure levels. (NIOSH) | 54k lb | -5% |
| Reef Services, LLCRockwater Energy Solutions INC | Tyler | Acrylic acid | 13k lb | -92% |
| Rex-Hide Industries INCRex-Hide Industries INC | Tyler | Zinc compoundsHealth riskGenerally low acute toxicity. Chronic high-dose exposure disrupts copper absorption and immune function. (ATSDR) | 11k lb | +5% |
| Trane TylerTrane Technologies Co LLC | Tyler | NickelHealth riskNickel compounds are IARC Group 1 carcinogens; inhalation exposure raises lung and nasal cancer risk. (IARC) | 1k lb | +87% |
| Pilot Thomas Logistcis LLC - TylerMaxum Enterprises LLC | Tyler | MethanolHealth riskAcutely toxic if ingested or inhaled. Metabolizes to formaldehyde and formic acid, causing blindness and metabolic acidosis. (EPA) | 524 lb | -47% |
| South Tyler Asphalt Plant | Tyler | Polycyclic aromatic compoundsHealth riskPAH class includes IARC Group 1 carcinogens (e.g., benzo[a]pyrene); long-term exposure raises cancer risk. (IARC, EPA) | 137 lb | +8% |
| Texasbit West Tyler Asphalt PlantCrh Americas INC | Tyler | Polycyclic aromatic compoundsHealth riskPAH class includes IARC Group 1 carcinogens (e.g., benzo[a]pyrene); long-term exposure raises cancer risk. (IARC, EPA) | 96 lb | -6% |
| Riley PowerBabcock Power INC | Tyler | ChromiumHealth riskHexavalent chromium (Cr-VI) is an IARC Group 1 carcinogen via inhalation, causing lung cancer; trivalent chromium is far less toxic. (IARC, EPA) | 55 lb | +8% |
All block groups in Smith County County, TX: 234,667 residents. County disparity score for pm2.5 (fine particulate) sits below the reference (80). Why we surface this →
Low-income
People of color
Under age 5
Over age 64
| Indicator | Disparity score | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 (fine particulate) | 80 | below the reference |
| Ozone | 35 | well below the reference |
| Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) | 57 | below the reference |
| Diesel particulate | 38 | well below the reference |
| Toxic releases (RSEI) | 81 | below the reference |
| Traffic proximity | 47 | well below the reference |
| Lead-paint risk (pre-1960 housing) | 63 | below the reference |
| Superfund site proximity | 0 | well below the reference |
| RMP-facility proximity | 96 | near the reference |
| Hazardous-waste site proximity | 35 | well below the reference |
| Underground storage tanks | 73 | below the reference |
| NPDES wastewater proximity | 46 | well below the reference |
| Drinking-water non-compliance | 112 | moderately above the reference |
Source: Census ACS 2018-2022 (5-year) + USEPA-clone EJ blockgroup stats (raw indicators + EJ disparity mirror).
Modeled adult-prevalence estimates published by CDC PLACES, paired with this county's pollution and demographic context. Comparisons are ecological, not causal — pollution and disease prevalence covary at the area level, but the data does not attribute any individual's diagnosis to local exposure. How this section works →
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023
PLACES uses BRFSS-modeled small-area estimates, not individual records. Crude prevalence shown above is the local rate as published; comparators are age-adjusted vs the Texas mean and the US mean — both population-weighted across counties — so geographies with different age structures stay apples-to-apples. Sources: CDC PLACES · 2025 release · BRFSS 2022-2023.
Pollution trends and TRI 2024 pages for every tracked city in this county. Alphabetical.
Sources.
All sources are federal public-domain datasets under 17 USC §105. We aggregate but do not relabel; the underlying observations remain attributable to EPA.